By the time they reached the first deposition, the real problem had become clear: Ben gives an honest account of mistakes he did and did not make. Emily Carter watched the reactions around the room before speaking. There was always a cost to asking questions in public, especially when the answers might embarrass people with influence. Yet the alternative was allowing an account that made no sense to stand unchallenged. The immediate question was not who deserved sympathy; it was what had actually happened.
Ben Foster had reason to be careful. A careless accusation could frighten someone into disappearing, while a quiet conversation might preserve testimony for another day. Emily Carter listened closely, asking for dates rather than rumors. The answer changed when they examined the original engineering drawings. It was a concrete detail, not a feeling, and that made it harder to dismiss. The people nearby stopped interrupting long enough to understand why it mattered.
Trust did not return simply because someone apologized. It returned when people showed up again, answered hard questions, and accepted consequences they could not negotiate away.
It was tempting to make the whole problem about one unpleasant personality. The documents suggested something less comfortable: a system that had rewarded looking away for a very long time.
The conversation moved from suspicion to responsibility. Emily Carter suggested that they record what each person remembered separately, before the accounts became tangled together. Nobody needed to pretend that a memory was a legal document. What they needed was a truthful beginning. The evidence concerning the original engineering drawings could be photographed, preserved, and compared with the other records already gathered. That practical decision made the next steps possible, even though it brought no immediate relief.
When Arthur Bell was mentioned, the atmosphere changed. Some people defended the name automatically; others went quiet because they had heard variations of the same story before. Emily Carter did not demand instant agreement. The intention was to establish what could be proven and leave the remaining questions open. Whatever happened next, it would not be fair to make Ben Foster carry the burden of convincing everyone alone.
The hardest part was not finding someone willing to speak. It was finding a person who would still stand behind those words once a powerful neighbor asked them to reconsider.
Every person at the table had something to lose. Some feared a paycheck, some a place to sleep, and others the small measure of respect they had worked decades to earn.
Before they left, a new lead pointed toward the city council chamber. Then his testimony changes how the entire disaster is understood. The discovery meant their next conversation would be harder to avoid.